A Protracted Lockdown: The WHO Archives and Research on the History of International Public Health Today

Document Type : Short Communication

Author

Ph.D. Candidate, Teaching Assistant, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

The WHO Archives in Geneva has been closed to researchers and the public since March 11, 2020. The Archives hold valuable, vast official correspondences, documents, photographs, and other kinds of dated records of the World Health Organization and related defunct establishments dating back to 1907. The closure of the archives became necessary in the wake of the Coronavirus pandemic and the general lockdown that attended it. While normalcy has since returned in virtually every institution and sector across the globe, the closure of the WHO Archives has continued unbroken for over 2 years and 4 months with grave implications for research and scholarship on the history of international public health. This essay is a critique of that protracted closure which is now clearly unnecessary and unjustifiable. It is also a call for an urgent end to it in the interest of the fundamental right of access to information, and knowledge production.

Keywords


  1. Craig, B.L., 1991. What are the Clients? Who are the Products?: The Future of Archival Public Services in Perspective. Archivaria, 31, p. 136.
  2. Jordanova, L., 2000. History in Practice. London: Arnold Publishers.
  3. Schellenberg, T., 1956. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  4. Steedman, C., 2002. Dust: The Archive and Cultural History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  5. Stoler, A.L., 2009. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.